High Efficiency, Millimeter Wave Deployable Reflector Antennas
The picture shows a comparison of a simulation of an ideal
reflector, black lines, with an ideal mathematical approximation of the
paraboloid surface, in red. The grating lobe at ~7.75 GHz is caused by the
periodic nature of the surface approximation. The measured parameters were
obtained by simulating the reflector with its measured geometry. All of the
plots are for 100 GHz operation. As shown, the reduction of the antenna
directivity is below ~-25 dB level, and thus reduces the efficiency of the
main beam by less than 0.3%. BEST’s proprietary reflective surface was measured
to have exceptional reflectivity up to 220 GHz.
Increased efficiency is important for radars, especially synthetic
aperture radars, where the efficiency of transmitter and receiver combine. For
example, for a 0.65-efficient reflector, the total efficiency (transmission and
receiving) is 42%. Thus, for the synthetic aperture radar that uses a lot of
power, a higher efficiency antenna can guarantee a higher duty cycle. Of
course, this applies to any other radar, or communication system.
Observations of passive microwave sensors need a very
efficient antenna, since only the naturally emitted noise is observed, and only
the noise from the scene is desired at the sensor input.
A challenge of meteorological observations is the need to
sample at the proper size and time resolution for the event/phenomena that is
being observed. For example, severe weather events, such as thunderstorms, or
tornadoes, require a spatial resolution on order of 10 km, and temporal
resolution on the order of 10-20 minutes. Naturally, all other observations,
e.g. clouds, precipitation, sea ice extension/characterization, tropical
cyclone intensity, and many more would also benefit from a shorter revisit time
and improved spatial resolution.
The figure from Kidd et al. shows precipitation observations
from ground based radar sensors and their correlation to a passive microwave
observing system with various spatial and temporal resolution parameters. For
high correlation observations, the spatial resolution of the sensors, and their
revisit time has to improve significantly. For example, for a conically
scanning sensor operating at 650 km altitude with a ground spatial
resolution of 15 km, a high level of correlation, greater than 0.9, can be
achieved only with a reflector aperture size of 4.5 m at 7 GHz. The corresponding
temporal resolution should be better than one hour, requiring approximately 12
sensors on orbit. At a revisit time of 0.5 hours and spatial resolution of
~5 km, severe weather events could be resolved. To achieve this, an
antenna aperture at 7 GHz needs to be 13.5 m and roughly 24 sensors
need to be deployed. Considering the number of sensors in these arrangements,
their individual cost becomes important very quickly.

